When i thought about it, [more like read a little more] biomimicry is just too broad of a topic for me to include as a conclusion or as a solution to my proposal. While i believe my first proposal in the previous post is very logical and if written well can be really successful, it's just a) too much of a task b) not suitable for a thesis topic.
I would have to explain way to much to get to my point, not to mention i'd have to be making something of it at the end. Biomimicry itself is a controversial topic which opens it's doors to a large range of topics, simply stating biomimicry will solve my issue would mean that i would have to very briefly touch on biomimcry and if done wrong it may seem rather rushed..
I'm decided to stick with: [keywords]
Beauty, aesthetics, neurology..
understanding how we perceive beauty and whether or not it is universal, how do we design for the PEOPLE rather than for other architects and artists....and so forth.
My hatred in architecture grew when i felt that we had to work within a certain framework of beauty for our work to be accepted. The whole beauty contest idea of architecture school put me off greatly and i suppose here is my chance to write about it. I admit that i'd be able to write a much more conclusive argument if i were to talk about sustainability but i always assume i can handle more than my capabilities allow.
No comments:
Post a Comment